Implicit Finite Differences Method for Solving Couple Nonlinear parabolic system with Constant Coefficients

Authors

  • Wafaa Abd Ibrahim and Jamil A. Ali Al-Hawasy Department of Mathematics, College of Science, Mustansiriyah University Author

Keywords:

Coupled Nonlinear Parabolic System, Implicit Finite Difference Method, Consistency, Convergence

Abstract

In this paper, the implicit finite differences method (IFDM) is used to solve couple of nonlinear parabolic system with constant coefficients (CNPS). At any discrete time  the proposed method is transforms the CNPS into a couple nonlinear algebraic system (CNAS), which is solved by applying the predictor- corrector techniques (PCT). This technique reduces the CNAS into a linear system and where the Cholesky decomposition (ChDe) is utilized to solve it at any time . The consistency and the convergence of the method are studied. Two examples are given and are solved using the IFDM to compare their results with the results obtained from solving the same examples but by utilizing the mixed Galerkin - Implicit Differences Methods (MGIDM). The results show that the MGIDM is more accurate than the IFDM.

References

Al-Hawasy J. A, Jawad M. A. (2019). Approximation solution of Nonlinear Parabolic partial Differential Equation via mixed Galerkin Finite Elements Method with the Crank-Nicolson Scheme. Iraqi J. Sci., 60(2):353-361.

Al-Hawasy J. A., Mansour N.F. ," (2021). The Galerkin-Implicit Method for Solving Nonlinear Variable Coefficients Hyperbolic Boundary Value Problem", Iraqi Journal of Science, vol. 62, no.11, pp. 3997-4005.

Al-Hawasy J. A., Abd Ibrahim W.," Mixed Galerkin-Implicit Differences Methods for Solving Couple Nonlinear Parabolic System with Constant Coefficients", Baghdad Science Iraqi, accepted for publishing 2024.

Bacopoulos A, chryssoverghi I. Numerical Solutions of Partial Differential Equations by finite Elements Methods. Athens Symeon publishing Co, 2003.

Datta Pranta Sh S, Ali H, Shafiqul Islam Mal, Shariful Islam Md. (2022). On the Numerical Treatment of 2D Nonlinear Parabolic PDEs by the Galerkin Method with Bivariate Bernstein Polynomial Bases. J. of Appl. Math. & Comp. 6(4): 410-422.

Delkhosh M, Parand K. (2019). A hybrid numerical method to solve nonlinear parabolic partial differential equations of time arbitrary order. Comput. Appl. Math. 38(76).

Enodi M.O., Tawfiq, L.N.M. (2019). New Approach for solving three Dimensional space partial Differential Equation, Baghdad Sci J.; 2019; 16(3).

Esmailzadeh M, Alavi J, Najafi HS. (2022).A numerical scheme for solving nonlinear parabolic partial differential equations with piecewise constant arguments. Int. J. Nonlinear Anal. Appl.,13(1): 783-798.

Saleem S, Aziz1, Hussain MZ. (2020). A Simple algorithm for numerical solution of nonlinear parabolic partial differential equations. Eng Comput.36(4):1763-1775.

Sowmiya P, Frankin Thami Iselvi, MS, Revathi Gk, Sakthipriya M.(2022). A study on Parabolic Partial Differential Equation infinite Difference Method and finite element method using mixed initial boundary value problem. Mathematical Statistician and Engineering Applications, 71(4):3647-3660.

Tadmor E. (2012). A review of Numerical Methods for Non-linear Partial Differential Equations Bull New Ser. Am. Math Soc., 49(4): 507-554.

Ureña F., Gavete L., Garća A., Benito J.J.,Vargas A.M.. (2019). solving second order non-linear parabolic PDEs using generalized finite difference method (GFDM). Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics. 354, 221-241.

Downloads

Published

2025-01-05